Updated: 4 July 2026
Corrections Policy — Australia
Australian Casino Bonuses aims for accuracy across every review, guide and comparison table we publish. Casino terms, limits and promotions change often, and we rely partly on reader reports to keep pace. This page explains what we consider a reportable error and how we handle correction requests. In the Australia context, that point is read alongside high-value limits with safer-play safeguards.
What counts as a reportable error
A reportable error is a factual claim on our site that no longer matches an operator's published terms, or that was incorrect when written. This includes wrong bonus amounts, incorrect wagering requirements, outdated licence information, superseded deposit or withdrawal limits, or a broken link to an operator we still cover. The local reading for Australia gives priority to high-value limits with safer-play safeguards.
Give us the exact page and the exact issue
Reports move fastest when they include the exact URL of the page in question, the specific text or figure you believe is wrong, and what you believe the correct information is, ideally with a link to where you found it. General comments about a casino without a specific page reference are harder for us to action. This matters in the Australia context when considering high-value limits with safer-play safeguards.
How we check a claim
Before making a change, we compare the reported issue against the operator's current terms and conditions page or other primary source where available. We prefer to verify against the operator's own published material rather than acting on a report alone, since promotional terms can vary by region and by account status. Its relevance to Australia is considered through high-value limits with safer-play safeguards.
Material changes versus minor corrections
A material change is one that could affect a reader's decision, such as an incorrect bonus percentage, a wrong wagering multiplier, or an inaccurate withdrawal limit. These are prioritised for prompt review. Minor corrections, such as a spelling fix or a formatting inconsistency, are still logged but do not carry the same priority. The practical emphasis for Australia stays on high-value limits with safer-play safeguards.
Dates and version history
Where a page carries a last-updated date, that date reflects the most recent substantive edit we are aware of. Correcting an error updates this date. We do not backdate corrections to make older content appear more current than the edit history supports. The local reading for Australia gives priority to high-value limits with safer-play safeguards.
Temporary publication states
While a report is being verified, we may temporarily add a caution note, adjust wording to be more conservative, or in some cases unpublish a specific figure or section rather than leave a disputed claim live. This is a holding measure, not a final outcome. For the Australia comparison, the editorial lens is high-value limits with safer-play safeguards.
When a report is not actioned
Not every report results in a change. If we cannot verify the claimed error against a primary source, if the reported issue reflects a promotional variation rather than an inaccuracy, or if the underlying page has already been superseded, we may decline to action the report. We aim to explain the reasoning briefly where practical. The Australia page weighs that detail against high-value limits with safer-play safeguards.
Supported criticism of our editorial judgement
Corrections are for factual inaccuracies, not disagreement with our editorial opinions, scoring approach or comparison methodology. If you disagree with how we've weighed a bonus against its wagering conditions, that feedback is welcome through our general contact route, but it is a different kind of input from a factual correction. For the Australia audience, that distinction supports high-value limits with safer-play safeguards.
Urgent security-related reports
If you believe a linked operator poses an active safety or security risk to readers, for example a fraudulent clone site impersonating a legitimate casino, flag this as urgent and include the exact address involved. We treat these reports with higher priority than routine content corrections. For Australia readers, the practical frame remains high-value limits with safer-play safeguards.
Personal casino disputes are handled separately
Corrections to our published content are separate from personal disputes about your own account, deposits or winnings with a casino. Those matters must be raised with the operator directly or with the relevant licensing or dispute body named in that operator's own terms. We cannot mediate individual player disputes. The practical emphasis for Australia stays on high-value limits with safer-play safeguards.
Privacy in the correction process
When reporting an error, please avoid including unnecessary personal or financial details. We only need enough information to identify and verify the page and the claimed inaccuracy, not your own account history with any operator. The local reading for Australia gives priority to high-value limits with safer-play safeguards.
A clear, repeatable process
Every report we receive is reviewed against the page in question, checked where possible against a primary source, and either actioned with an updated publication date or closed with a brief note on why no change was made. The form below this policy is the direct route into that process. The Australia page weighs that detail against high-value limits with safer-play safeguards.
Helping us stay accurate
Clear, specific reports with a page reference and supporting source are the single most useful thing you can send us, and they are what keeps this comparison genuinely reliable for other readers. Its relevance to Australia is considered through high-value limits with safer-play safeguards.